decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
And another thing ... | 83 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
And another thing ...
Authored by: nsomos on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 03:26 PM EDT
If whatever security hole is not plugged, then whoever
did this could easily sell short a number of different stocks,
make the false tweet, and then clean up covering
their positions after stocks fall, but before the rebound.

Then there is the alternative strategy of buying when
the stocks are down, and waiting for them to come up again
when the information is discovered to have been false,
and then selling to make the profit.

Either way, they have seen just how stupid wall street is
from this first time.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

'Stupid' is perhaps the wrong word, 'paranoid' might..
Authored by: albert on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 04:05 PM EDT
be a better fit. Paranoia (of losing one's money) is proportional to the amount
of money one has. As has been pointed out before, there's no logic in the
Market. It always goes down when such things happen. If there's a _perception_
that it might go down, it goes down, which feeds selloffs, etc. A positive
feedback system has negative consequences.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I’ve never been able to figure out Wall Street
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 04:16 PM EDT
Steve Jobs, from a recent Newspick

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It is too embarrassing
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 07:41 PM EDT

So they won't admit it. Someone told them that you never, ever admit your
mistakes, because admitting mistakes makes you look weak.

Not admitting mistakes makes you look foolish and untrustworthy. Guess
they prefer that to looking weak.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )