decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
What legal rights should Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev have ? | 210 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Double Quadfecta
Authored by: hardmath on Sunday, April 21 2013 @ 11:30 PM EDT
(This article and the last) Go, artp!



---
Recursion is the opprobrium of the mathists.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Thank you - Authored by: artp on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 05:47 PM EDT
What legal rights should Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev have ?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 01:10 AM EDT
http://boingboing.net/2013/04/21/what-legal-rights-should-bosto.html

"An array of perspectives on what legal rights the 19-year-old American
citizen suspected of co-executing the Boston Marathon bombings has, and whether
law enforcement is obliged to honor those rights under the circumstances."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

alsup vs gov't (re: no fly list)
Authored by: designerfx on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 01:15 PM EDT
Interesting!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/04/state-
secrets-showdown-looms-162193.html


basically, gov't is trying to assert executive privilege of
the no fly list and Alsup is pushing back.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple's slide into mediocrity and eventual oblivion
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 02:29 PM EDT

They say lightning never strikes twice in the same place, but Steve Jobs made it strike not just twice, but several times, with the iPod, iPhone, iPad, Pixar, and others. A visionary combined with the new opportunities provided by the early decades of the Digital Revolution, Steve Jobs plucked all the low hanging fruit off the tree.

That tree has matured and keeps on growing but the Digital Revolution is over now. It can no longer be described as a revolution when digital technology has become taken for granted as an intimate part of our daily lives. All the low hanging fruit are gone and so is Steve Jobs.

Apple is now just another company like Microsoft that having clawed its way to the top, preoccupies itself more with how to keep its competitors at bay than in developing new products. There is no more reason to believe Apple can continue to innovate like before than to believe Microsoft can. Its shareholders are just now realizing that.

Shares of the word’s most fawned over company have slid from an all-time high of $705 last September to about $391 as of Friday’s close. Apple stock is the lowest it’s been since the death of Steve Jobs in 2011. Apple’s industry-best gross margins peaked at just north of 47% a year ago. In January Apple reported gross margin of about 39%. With ongoing pressure from Samsung and lower-priced and lower-margin gadgets running Android, Apple will not be able to regain its former hefty margin.

I would suggest that the hords of people who have bought iPhones and iPads are not part of the core Apple fandom but rather, people who bought these products based on same decision making process that leads others to by Galaxies and Nexi, rather than through blind loyalty. There is no reason to believe these people continue to buy Apple products for any reason other than familiarity and inertia, and the fact that Apple still makes good products. At any time however, any one of these people could buy something else. There is no reason to judge Apple's future performance on its past performance.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Senators Are Trying to Rush Through a Massive Online Sales Tax Hike
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 02:31 PM EDT
http://gizmodo.com/5995187/senators-are-trying-to-rush-through-a-massive-online-
sales-tax-hike?utm_source=feedly

"The bill would see online business in states that don't impose sales tax
having to pay up to to governments that do. It wouldn't, however, impose any
such expectation on brick-and-mortar stores. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the bill is
being supported by the likes of Wal-Mart—but also Amazon."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Further Proof That Judge Alsup Is Awesome
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 02:32 PM EDT
As if we needed any more proof.

Showdown looms over State Secrets privilege in 'No-Fly List' case

I don't usually think much of the U.S. court system. People like Carmen Ortiz turn my stomach. But IMNSHO, Judge William Alsup is _officially_ super-awesome.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Carmen Ortiz and the boston bomber prosecution
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 05:52 PM EDT
Some readers here, may have read with dismay the news that U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz would be prosecuting the Boston Marathon bombing suspect. (The same Ms. Ortiz who was supervising the case against Aaron Schwarz before he committed suicide; that case was being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Stephen Heymann and Scott Garland, working under the supervision of Ortiz). Well, she's the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, so I guess there's no surprise that she is involved in this case.

Anyway, this case (the federal case against the suspect in the marathon bombings) will be "prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys William Weinreb and Aloke Chakravarty from the Anti-Terrorism and National Security Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, with assistance from the Counterterrorism Section of the Justice Department’s National Security Division."

USDOJ: Suspect in Boston Marathon Attack Charged with Using a Weapon of Mass Destruction

Like all civilized human beings, I am enraged by the attack that occurred at the Boston Marathon, and I hope this case will be able to deliver at least some closure to all of those who were affected by this heinous crime.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )