decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
That too - sadly | 210 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
That too - sadly
Authored by: Wol on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 03:51 PM EDT
If you're going to talk about terrorism, you're better off talking about the
Irish Question. Or the American War Of Independence.

But NOT about WW2. That was terror, not terrorism. While the distinction isn't
clear, terror is where you have two clearly defined sides, eg the Axis Powers
and the Allies. The Nazis bombed Coventry. The Allies flattened Dresden and
Hamburg. (My great-uncle lost his wife and daughters in Hamburg somewhere
between the bombers and the Russians.) Clearly both were terror attacks. Clearly
both were NOT terrorism.

Terrorism is where it is hard to draw the line between the sides. These two
bombers for example, where they naturalised Americans? To all intents and
purposes (other than possibly legal) they are Americans, I believe.

For pretty much all the 19th century, the IRA (a *protestant* organisation, by
the way!!!) were viewed - by the IRISH - as a disloyal terrorist organisation.
And it was over-reaction by the English that changed everything ...

For most of the 18th century, American Independence Movement was likewise
regarded by most Americans as a disloyal terrorist organisation. And it was
over-reaction and blunders by the British that changed everything ...

If you deny this guy his rights, you have just ceased to be a true and loyal
American ...

And, speaking as an outsider, it seems that American Justice is far too often
the uncivilised justice of the lynch mob - while I doubt he is an innocent in
the wrong place at the wrong time do you really want this to turn into another
showcase of all that is WORST about American Justice? And give the terrorists
yet more ammunition?

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • That too - sadly - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 01:27 AM EDT
    • That too - sadly - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 02:31 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )