decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Of Course It's Physical | 210 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Of Course It's Physical
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 04:21 PM EDT
> One thing the pro-software patent folk can't insist is that it is physical

All those boxes of floppy discs Fedexed around the globe with
Windows 95 were physical alright. Just think about one falling
on your head. Sure, as software got more complex they moved
onto CDs in nice vinyl binders, still something substantial you
can hold in your hand.

Now your task is to tease our learned friends gently over the line
to the software that is downloaded from London server to Lima
client in the eye of a wink. Ask them where the physicality went.
Make them think about the paradigm. And make sure they
understand the software itself did not change form.

Likening it to ink on paper isn't good enough. Webster's dictionary
is absolutely physical. Lawyers love documents printed on paper
just for their physicality, and they do not understand how that
physicality can disappear when the document becomes a computer
file. In New Zealand we've recently had some bizarre requests for
unintended recipients of emails to "return the document".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )