|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 20 2013 @ 11:09 PM EDT |
Unfortunately, in this case, once damages have been assessed, the party assessed
has no recourse, even if the patent(s) on which the damages are assessed is/are
later ruled invalid. (Please note that I'm not ruling out the possibility that
all of these patents may ultimately be ruled invalid.)
This is, of course, why Apple wants a final determination on damages, and,
conversely, why Samsung is fighting against this, prior to final determination
of the validity of the patent(s) itself/themselves.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 21 2013 @ 04:51 AM EDT |
| If that's the law then change it and why has it not already been changed? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: ukjaybrat on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 03:21 PM EDT |
which is why it should be mandatory to conduct dna tests
before assigning child support in a case where the man
refuses to pay child support.
My cousin was victim of this very thing. He is a great guy
that just made some bad decisions. Turns out his 20 year old
son went in for some surgery and long story short... "wait,
you're not my son?"
His son didn't know he wasn't the father either. After the
fact the mother said "i know. i lied," packed up and left.
it's a shame that evil people get away with evil things.
---
IANAL[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
