decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Danger of irrepairable harm | 293 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Danger of irrepairable harm
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 18 2013 @ 11:02 AM EDT
The system is supposed to see who it would cause the most
irreparable harm to, and then rule to prevent the largest. In
this case there is no real irreparable harm to apple, just an
imaginary one, however there is a very real and very large
one to samsung.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

On the contrary.....
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 18 2013 @ 11:57 AM EDT

The courts are mostly left alone by big business in the UK because if you try
these sorts of plays in a UK court you will most likely find yourself roundly
spanked.

Cf. Apples non-apology apology, and the judges public statements about lack of
integrity.




[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Danger of irrepairable harm
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 18 2013 @ 12:05 PM EDT
Are you saying that Apple launched this law suit knowing full well that the
patents would eventually be found invalid? If so, then they could be found to be
"vexatious" litigants, and Samsung's attorneys fees, plus all costs,
plus possible other sanctions, should be leveled against Apple.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )