|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 18 2013 @ 09:38 AM EDT |
The "appropriate figure" would mean irreparable harm and prejudice to
Apple. Apple started into the case with a reasonable expectation of the
timeline for both the case as well as their patent invalidation processes. They
took investments based on those reasonable expectations.
Those are business processes based on a proper understanding and evaluation of
the current judicial and patent processes, and patents and patent cases have
been filed according to best business practices and reliance on the system.
Juxtaposing or shortcircuiting the proceedings here would place justice before
viable, tried and established business processes, and it is not the job of the
American judicial system to recklessly serve justice without heeding the
consequences.
They do that sort of carriage of justice in Great Britain, and as a result, the
courts are mostly left alone in the woods by big business which prefers to go
elsewhere.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|