decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Vote here | 113 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Vote here
Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 11:44 AM EDT
Wepolls

Note that the usual few M$ paid shills are making all the usual comments....

I expect that other similar sites will be around, where we can express our views.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft hits Foxconn for patent license
Authored by: rcsteiner on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 03:46 PM EDT
The purpose of business is to make money, not to create a useful product.
Microsoft has taken that to rather lofty heights.

---
-Rich Steiner >>>---> Mableton, GA USA
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So we're only talking a few thousand dollars?
Authored by: betajet on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 04:31 PM EDT
According to the tech consultancy Asymco, Microsoft is likely to earn several times more money through its Android patents than it does from licences for its own Windows Phone system.
Given the amount Microsoft gets from Windows Phone licenses, "several times more" is probably a million at most. I keep thinking of the extortion scene in Austin Powers where the targets collapse with laughter at the paltry sum demanded.

JMO/YMMV

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft hits Foxconn for patent license
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 04:40 PM EDT
Thanks for the extra links, I thought you might have been on to something, but there's a lot of loose threads to follow there

Microsoft gets $5 for every HTC phonerunning Android, according to Citi analyst Walter Pritchard¶, who released a big report on Microsoft this morning. Businessinsider.com, check chart at bottom, unfortunately two years out of catchup.

Is Microsoft getting $5 per HTC Android handset sold? The Grauniad can't get much closer to real numbers than we can, but observes the nips going in deeper, and that Android licensing revenue far exceeds WinPho licensing revenue. guardian.co.uk

Microsoft plans to boost the licensing fees of its software for the Android mobile phones of HTC to US$7.5-US$12.5 per unit, up from existing US$5, according to a report of Citibank Securities¶. cens.com [Taiwan]

[MS] is asking for between $7.50 and $12.50 in negotiations with makers of other Android devices, geekwire.com

as per the patent law, Microsoft Corporation cannot “double-dip”by charging both a product’s designer and its manufacturer a full royalty charge. valuewalk.com

The agreement comes just over two years after Microsoft announced it had filed legal action against the Asian firm in the US courts. BBC

So Foxconn has caved rather than enter the farce of the US court system. Meanwhile where is the White Knight Google with its Flaming Sword? Or do they see hapless punters coughing up the MS tax as trivial in the wave of popularity of Android? Seems odd that they continue to support the existence of a blood sucking parasite on their ecosystem. Is this a hint of their own future behaviour?
¶ A bullish note from Citi's Walter Pritchard is helping Microsoft (MSFT +1.9%) add to yesterday's big gains,
is being widely quoted by the financial market blogs. Does Walter have inside info that the tech press doesn't? Or is he just margin scraping?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )