decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Microsoft hits Foxconn for patent license | 113 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Definitive list of Microsoft's Patents vs Android/Chrome/Linux + prior art search?
Authored by: TiddlyPom on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 07:59 AM EDT
There must be some way of destroying Microsoft's attempts to limit/tax open
source usage through patents.

Is there a definitive list of the patents that Microsoft uses to 'tax' Android
and Linux and could we start a prior art search with the intention of de-fanging
Microsoft's ability to impose costs on open source usage?

---
Support Software Freedom - use GPL licenced software like Linux and LibreOffice
instead of proprietary software like Microsoft Windows/Office or Apple OS/X

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Short answer: no. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 01:03 PM EDT
Microsoft hits Foxconn for patent license
Authored by: odysseus on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 10:55 AM EDT
Nope, it's the software patents which Foxconn has taken out to
"protect" their customers. Surely it's up to the customers to arrange
such matters? And what happens with customers who already have paid MS
protection, do they pay twice? Stinks big time.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft hits Foxconn for patent license
Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 11:34 AM EDT
The whole thing is disgusting. M$ are the biggest bunch of scumbags ever, and this is yet more of their utterly disgraceful behaviour.

A clue is in the BBC article:

According to the tech consultancy Asymco, Microsoft is likely to earn several times more money through its Android patents than it does from licences for its own Windows Phone system.
That is what it is really about, M$ are too inept and incompetent to complete fairly in the phone market, so they have to harass and bully others with bogus patent suits until they cave in and pay up. It is basically a protection racket, and I think there is a law which covers that. RICO?

What is really annoying is that the downstream customers of Foxconn, everywhere in the world, are probably paying for a bunch of bogus M$ patents that are only valid in the US anyway. I do hope that the EU is watching closely.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft / Foxconn deal
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 17 2013 @ 01:08 PM EDT
Click Here

”The licensing agreement with Microsoft represents those efforts and our continued support of international trade agreements that facilitate implementation of effective patent protection,” says Samuel Fu, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (TPE:2317)’s intellectual property director.

Man, this patent madness must come to an end. It's extortion.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )