decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
dos 5 | 265 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
dos 5
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 14 2013 @ 03:18 PM EDT
Previous poster.

You may be right that Dos 5 did not contain command history. It has assuredly
been a long time since I studied Dos 5. But you are also surely right about
4Dos. For quite some time back then, I was using NDos (same thing under a
different brand name), and it surely had the command history feature. And so did
Midnight Commander. The other package which might have had the command history
feature was dosshell. That was from Microsoft, as I recall, and came as an
enhancement to Dos 5.0, and was installed on the old 386 when I bought it from
the store. But at this point I have no detailed memory at all about the features
of dosshell.

Point is, being able to scroll backwards through the commend history was
definitely available back then and the feature could be found in more than one
product on the open market.

And, of course, the time period is relevant here. I got the 386 in December
1991. I never did put Windows of any version on that computer. I did put
Slackware Linux on it either late in 1995 or very early in 1996. The reason I
made that switch was that I was fleeing in horror from the "necessity"
to install Win 95. The entire design of Win 95 clashed severely and
fundamentally with my own concepts of what a computer was for and why I wanted
to use one, and its installation would have erased years of my own previously
effective efforts to set up my own computer so that it could be used efficiently
for my own work.

As I said above, though, there simply must be more to this than meets the eye.
The patent surely must be for something more than, or a bit different from,
merely having and using a history list. Surely even the USPTO is not so blind
and stupid?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

dos 5
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 15 2013 @ 06:01 PM EDT

History was definitely present in MS-DOS 6, via the doskey TSR application. While this wasn't turned on by default, it was present and could be added to your autoexec.bat.

I'm pretty sure that MS-DOS 6 predates the priority date on the patent by at least a few years.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )