|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 03:18 PM EDT |
Obstreperous:
Noisy and difficult to control
Although the UK Court
seems to have managed a certain level of control over Apples
noisiness.
Cantankerous:
Bad-tempered, argumentative, and
uncooperative
Yup... fits Apples behavior to a T!
Apple to
Court:
No, we will not comply with your decision if you're decision is that
the licensing fee should be more then $1 per device!
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: webster on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 08:25 AM EDT |
.
Someone should tell Judge Lucy [Koh] [and Judge Judy] about what Judge Robert
[Scola] said and did.
The scrutiny of corporate influence campaigns and litigation and what they fight
with [patents] exposes the world and its governments as a field of exploitation
and gaming for the wealthy [corporations and owners].
People that have millions shouldn't be allowed to go to court or get patents.
They can hire their own agencies. Some would accurately argue, "They
already have; that is what government is." Our Supreme Court agrees with
that.
Some day a judge will say "The equities of law and fact are in balance.
Therefore a flip of the coin would not be an abuse of discretion."
.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 09:22 AM EDT |
I wish more judges would. On balance, litigants increasingly seem to be trolls
or dinosaurs trying to prop up a failing business. That's not what the courts
are for.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
