decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
ROFL - That's funny: Oracle a primary sponser of two open source projects | 72 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Ummm... wait...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 03:21 PM EDT
How about a conterclaim: predatory antitrust claims.

There are literally hundreds of free Linux distributions. The open-source model
has proven itself, and is now widespread. Apple refuses to play and keeps its OS
to itself. There are a couple specialty OSs that are licensed for embedded
devices, but otherwise, the only major OS maker who is locked into the
over-priced commercial model is Microsoft.

Microsoft could get with the times and open-source Windows, or even release it
under a greatly relaxed license, and many industry analysts have been saying
this would be a good move for years. (And current reviews of Windows 8 suggest
this may be the only thing that will keep it relevant...)

This isn't about 1 company (google) trying to undermine everyone else with below
cost pricing, its about 1 company (Microsoft) trying undermine the entire market
with bogus complaints to maintain their obsolete business model.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Coming soon to an Ubuntu release near you!
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 03:31 PM EDT
If giving away software is wrong then this should apply to other areas as well.

For example broadcast Radio and TV. The programs are given away for free. This
is anti-competitive against the cable and subscription radio and TV companies.

In restaurants it is common for water to be given away for free, this is
anti-competitive against the bottled water and other drinks manufacturers.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

ROFL - That's funny: Oracle a primary sponser of two open source projects
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 03:35 PM EDT

The full statement:

Since it acquired Sun in 2010, Oracle has been the primary sponsor of two important open source projects, Java and MySQL
What it fails to indicate is that Oracle appears to be attempting to scuttle both those projects.

My humble opinion on Oracle's behavior of course.

Presumably, Oracle wouldn't want this practice declared anticompetitive by European bureaucrats.
Actually, if my opinion is correct then Oracle would want that. It could give them the excuse they need to close the open source doors on both projects.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )