decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Off topic | 72 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections
Authored by: The_Pirate on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:02 AM EDT
...Here, please.

[ Reply to This | # ]

News picks
Authored by: The_Pirate on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:03 AM EDT
......!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off topic
Authored by: The_Pirate on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:05 AM EDT
How much wood could a Woodchuck chuck, if a Woodchuck could chuck wood?
1) 0.8 cu. meters
2) 1.2 cu. meters
3) 1.5 cu. meters

[ Reply to This | # ]

Comes Goes Here
Authored by: artp on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:50 AM EDT
See the "Comes v. MS" link above for more information.

---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Those that said Koh knew at a Final Office Action was are clearly wrong.
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 12:46 PM EDT
Those that said Koh knew at a Final Office Action was and that Apple was somehow
wrong or rude to explain that "Final Office Action" didn't mean
prosecution was over are clearly wrong.

There is no way for the parties to know what a reexamination will be concluded.
That is entirely up to the Office and, if necessary, the Appeal Board. Anyone
that could issue this order:

(3) On April 9, 2013, both parties shall file a statement, not to exceed four
pages per party, regarding when their US PTO reexaminations of the opposing
party’s patents will conclude and what effect the concluded reexaminations will
have on any new trial or appeal. On April 16, both parties may file a response,
not to exceed two pages per party.

clearly doesn't understand much about how the USPTO operates.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Is "Brief" a term of irony?
Authored by: tz on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 01:27 PM EDT
Lawyers used to be paid by the word, so like a coder being paid in kLOCs, would
be verbose. But these days?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Well played Samsung... Well played.
Authored by: JonCB on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:21 PM EDT
The Court can ensure expedition of the reexaminations by ordering Apple to inform the PTO of this litigation. MONKEYmedia, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 1:10- CV-00319 (E.D. Tex.), Dkt. 103 at 2 (granting Apple request for stay and requesting PTO (and ordering plaintiff) to expedite reexaminations), Maroulis Decl. Ex. A. If Apple cooperates in expediting the PTO proceedings, which the Court should require, the proceedings will reach completion promptly.
Using your opponents prior cases in support of your own argument... Priceless.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )