|
Authored by: JK Finn on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 09:32 AM EDT |
MPAA writes thus:
Bouchat seeks nothing less than a de facto
right to control
the depiction of facts—in this case, events that actually
happened on the football fieldsimply because those
facts
include the
fact that the players wore uniforms that include
Bouchat’s copyrighted logo. It
is antithetical to the
purposes of copyright to use it to force an inaccurate
depiction of actual events.
Excellent. So, when **AA seeks to
force an inaccurate
depiction of actual events like, say, a child busting a
move
to some music, simply because those events include a
copyrighted refrain
from a known artist, can this amicus
brief be used to counteract the takedown
notice?
JK Finn [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 10:10 AM EDT |
Saving it for a later day. To throw back in their faces. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|