decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Computers are not machines? | 141 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Computers are not machines?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 09:32 AM EDT
PJ
I love how you like are starting to belittle and make fun of
my thread. The problem I find with your statements is the
logical fallacy you made.

He author of the slide stated

"Software is all about the implementation of a function
across machines."

And you replied with um no, software is not machines.

The problem is the author never stated that software was
machines, but that it ran on machines.

This is even ignoring the realization that he was not
speaking of software, but software patents.

I would hope that as someone who write this you would
atleast come out and point out where what the author of the
slide stated that software was a machine, or at least be a
little more respectful when someone does find an issue with
one of your posts.

Now PJ I have been a loyal follower of yours since the start
of the SCO saga around 10 years ago. I have been a defender
of yours over the years, picking apart other's mistruths
about you, or their own logical issues when trying to attack
your posts.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )