decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Illegal Per Se | 348 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Illegal Per Se
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, April 09 2013 @ 02:32 PM EDT
And in the UK, 20% is a big enough market share to get the Monopolies and
Mergers Commission seriously interested in you...

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Illegal Per Se
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, April 09 2013 @ 02:44 PM EDT
Not quite. There has to be, in the US, some activity that is per se illegal.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not Illegal Per Se
Authored by: lnuss on Tuesday, April 09 2013 @ 04:05 PM EDT
The Bell System was an ACTUAL monopoly (no one else in, or allowed to be in, the
market) in many (not quite all) markets, and there was nothing illegal about
that -- they were actually regulated by state, local and national governments --
but there were antitrust lawsuits going on a lot of the time, which contended a
MISUSE of the monopoly, and they finally consented to the breakup for their own
reasons (they wanted into markets not available to them, such as computers) --
it wasn't externally imposed without consent.

Monopoly, per se, isn't illegal, although you have all those who are trying to
bring the biggy down (sometimes even with good reason).

I'd like to see the law that says monopolies are illegal in the U.S.


---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )