decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
About that Google Account | 348 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
About that Google Account
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 09 2013 @ 06:46 PM EDT
The choices should be equal sized and adjacent,
and scaled to fit whatever size the device screen.

[Yes I want to sign up to Google] [No thanks I'll do that later]

IIRC the No option was scrolled below the bottom of screen
on my first device, and was formatted like a link rather than
a big clickable button. Yes I realise that much of this is in
the hands of the device maker, or the carrier, who "skins"
that particular version of Android to their own flavor. How much
of that skinning is under the direction of, or indeed controlled
by Google is debatable. Google must approve the result
for the vendors to continue using the Android Trade Mark.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Actually, the anonymous coward has a point
Authored by: celtic_hackr on Wednesday, April 10 2013 @ 11:32 AM EDT
I'm fairly PC literate, being an old school coder and all around geek of Gothic
proportions, but my wife is completely lost in the shuffle (example, she just
got a new Android phone, and was on a support call to reset her voicemail
password and he told her to push the enter key, which she couldn't find, I
reached over and pushed the little phone handset icon button for her).

The "set-up-the-device" screens to one like her would certainly seem
to be "required", where those of us more tech savvy know we can
"reject" certain prompts. I'm not sure this pattern is any overt
attempt at subterfuge on Google's part. The screens are designed by tech savvy
people, who frequently have trouble stepping out of the geek, tech savvy box and
picture what the unwashed non-tech savvy world would see.

TL;DR This is not the subterfuge you are looking for.

-- Press any key!? There's NO any Key on my keyboard!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )