decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Well, there's your problem. | 167 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Well, ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 08 2013 @ 05:02 AM EDT
This is the second time this has been mentioned recently on Groklaw (a possible
invention having its patentability railroaded by the patent being made overly
broad).

Until such patent [legalese] writers are found liable for the costs they cause
(not just for the possible inventor in losing patent protection, but also for
innocent victims of use of such patents), it ain't gunna stop.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Well, there's your problem.
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 08 2013 @ 08:08 AM EDT
The problem is patent attorneys. A patent should be authored by an engineer
skilled in the art. If a patent attorney is not skilled in the art of
[whatever], then they should have nothing to do with the writing of a patent.

After all, the audience that a patent should be written for is an engineer
skilled in the appropriate art. The best person to write for that audience is
another engineer.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )