decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Wondering if perhaps there should be an ApplevSamsung p.3 page ?? | 355 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections Thread
Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 01:58 PM EDT
Please show corrections like

Bad word => Good word

in the title

---
Beware of him who would deny you access to information for in his heart he
considers himself your master.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Offtopic here
Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:00 PM EDT
Any one posting on topic will have to go through all my previous posts and
correct my spelling using UK English

---
Beware of him who would deny you access to information for in his heart he
considers himself your master.

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Picks Here
Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:02 PM EDT
All the news that's new today.

Please include a link to the news story in your comment so we can go and find it
after it scrolls of the front page.

---
Beware of him who would deny you access to information for in his heart he
considers himself your master.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Comes Documents here
Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:05 PM EDT
Please paste them in plain text but with hypertext showing to allow PJ to easily
cut and paste them into the relevant sections

---
Beware of him who would deny you access to information for in his heart he
considers himself your master.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Bragging rights
Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:07 PM EDT
This thread is just to allow people to gasp at my total lack of a live that
allowed me to post the first 5 comments on this article :-)

---
Beware of him who would deny you access to information for in his heart he
considers himself your master.

[ Reply to This | # ]

The Seventh Amendment
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:08 PM EDT
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law.

---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.

"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

[ Reply to This | # ]

If (1), then why bother allowing (2)?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:48 PM EDT
(1) The Court DENIES Apple’s Administrative Motion Seeking an April 3 Case Management Conference, ECF No. 2283.

(2) The Court GRANTS Apple’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File One-Page Reply Supporting Its Administrative Motion Seeking an April 3 Case Management Conference, ECF No. 2287.
If she has denied Apple's Administrative Motion Seeking an April 3 Case Management Conference in (1), then why bother allowing them to file a reply supporting that motion in (2)? Seems rather silly to me.

[ Reply to This | # ]

We saw Apple's arguments before
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 03:01 PM EDT

Isn't it ironic there seemed to be a couple posters in the last article arguing Apple's very points?

It's almost like they could read Apple's mind and knew what Apple would be filing with Judge Koh.

RAS

[ Reply to This | # ]

Wondering if perhaps there should be an ApplevSamsung p.3 page ??
Authored by: nsomos on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 03:55 PM EDT
I am trying to find this Samsung motion that mentions
the seventh amendment. Yet I see nothing on the
ApplevSamsung p.2 page that is more recent than

[2213] 02-Jan-2013

Surely there have been multiple motions and docs
filed since then. Perhaps the woodlands2 theme
is lacking an ApplevSamsung p.3 that the other themes have?
(nope, I tried another theme)

But I found it ...
Samsung's opposition to Apple's motion for an April 3rd conference,
Docket #2286 at
http://groklawstatic.ibiblio.org/pdf4/ApplevSamsung-2286.pdf

We don't have to guess why Samsung is mentioning the
seventh amendment. They tell us in plain lawyer-speak.

Samsung writes ...
"For example, under the Seventh Amendment, Samsung has a right
to a new trial on liability and damages for products that
will be the subject of the new trial under the Seventh Amendment."

Thanks

[ Reply to This | # ]

Judge Koh Decides Not to Decide Yet, and Apple Says USPTO's Final Office Action Isn't Really "Final" Final ~pj
Authored by: fstanchina on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 04:40 PM EDT
[...] with Apple putting in a declaration in support of Samsung.
They must be joking.

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • No joke - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 05 2013 @ 12:08 PM EDT
Judge Koh Decides Not to Decide Yet, and Apple Says USPTO's Final Office Action Isn't Really "Final" Final ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 04:44 PM EDT
After reading "A. The Seventh Amendment Requires That Certain Infringement
Issues Be Tried To The Jury Deciding Damages"
I came away thinking that Samsung was poking a stick into the
Judges's eye for letting the trial get to a jury ruling,
knowing that the jury was totally confused. By the foreman's
own admission, the jury chose to ignore the Judges
instructions and took what ever path would lead them to some
preconceived conclusion and purpose.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Judge Koh Decides Not to Decide Yet, and Apple Says USPTO's Final Office Action Isn't Really "Final" Final ~pj
Authored by: JamesK on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 05:18 PM EDT
So, she has to decide on whether to decide on deciding... ;-)


---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.

[ Reply to This | # ]

That's why investing in litigation is for fools.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 05:31 PM EDT
. I agree.

-C.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Perhaps Apple's thermonuclear threat to South Korea will be as successful as someone else's?
Authored by: SirHumphrey on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 05:39 PM EDT
Plenty of bluster and PR mileage, but <OT> in the real world I think China
is not the least bit interested in nuclear fallout drifting across the mainland,
and will suggest that someone pull their head in. </OT>

[ Reply to This | # ]

What I find most remarkable
Authored by: inode_buddha on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 11:48 PM EDT
What I find most remarkable is the amount and quality of 'turfing going on in
other places about this. Its really extensive in some ways. I find it
interesting to discover the base assumptions of the posters which always boild
down to: "Whatever the company does is always OK".

That sort of thinking, frankly, scares the crap out of me, because its a
religion at that point. And I'm a religious guy, but that sort of thinking
should *not* be applied to companies and constructs of Man.

I suppose its the refusal of critical thought , even of ones own thing, that is
so scary. And yet, how is one supposed to grow without critical thinking?

---
-inode_buddha

"When we speak of free software,
we are referring to freedom, not price"
-- Richard M. Stallman

[ Reply to This | # ]

Told ya so: USPTO's Final Office Action Isn't Really "Final" Final n/t
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 04 2013 @ 01:09 AM EDT

[ Reply to This | # ]

Judge Koh Decides Not to Decide Yet, and Apple Says USPTO's Final Office Action Isn't Really "Final" Final ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 04 2013 @ 10:07 AM EDT
'If you choose not to decide
you still have made a choice..'

-Rush

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )