decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Where The Free Software Movement Went Wrong | 355 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Where The Free Software Movement Went Wrong
Authored by: PJ on Sunday, April 07 2013 @ 09:24 PM EDT
Well, thinking like that is how you end up
with software that won't do what you want, or
features that you love being dropped, or
documents you need that you can't access any
more.

It's all in how you look at it. Short term
thinking makes people think current convenience
is all there is. But in the long term, you
are better off with Free Software, because you
always have options that no one can drop, change,
or block to deny you.

So caring about freedom leads to long term
satisfaction. But for it to work, you have to
care enough to put up with some short term
frustrations, sometimes, even a lesser experience
while people work on things. But in the long
term, you get there reliably.

Short term, well, you see Google Reader dropped,
just as one example. You see iTunes changed
whenever Apple feels like it, maybe in ways you
don't much like. I saw a Windows 8 laptop today,
and if I was a Microsoft person, I'd be totally
confused by it, and that would really annoy me.
You don't get asked what you'd like, and clearly
no one asked for Windows 8. It's Microsoft
strategy for reasons that eventually we'll understand,
but meanwhile frankly it's awful. I totally get
now why sales are so low.

But if I don't like something in Fedora, I can
change it. Any FOSS you can. Don't like the icons?
Change them. Design your own if you want to, or
others offer them. It's just so different, and
really it is very pleasant.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )