decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Unless you are breaking stuff, | 355 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Unless you are breaking stuff,
Authored by: Wol on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 05:17 PM EDT
Why do people trust G more than fb?

Well, certainly as far as G+ is concerned, it only makes stuff visible to the
circles I *explicitly* put my posts into. In other words, stuff isn't visible
until I actively publish it.

fb, on the other hand ... stuff is publicly visible *by* *default*, and fb also
has a habit of making changes that result in your attempts to restrict access
getting bypassed.

For example, my wife has recently re-published several fb posts. What that
means, is if A posts some article and tries to restrict it so only B, C and D
can see it, if C likes it and republishes it all of a sudden everybody who
follows C can see it. And they can republish it to their following ... I don't
know how you could do that with G+ - I don't think you can!

In other words, for people who value their privacy, they trust Google NOT to
subvert their attempts to keep private things private. (That's not to say Google
don't screw up, they do. But fb seems to screw up "accidentally on
purpose" rather too often ...)

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Unless you are breaking stuff,
Authored by: DieterWasDriving on Thursday, April 04 2013 @ 12:42 PM EDT
It's curious that they primarily break things that let them sell more personal
information, and then won't fix them immediately -- presumably waiting to see if
there is a big outcry.

It really irks me when things I've signed up, such as airline frequent flier
programs, "reset" their preferences or change the list so that
previous opt-outs of junk mail are changed to opt-in. The worst only do it
every few months, and eventually get a close. FB seems to do it repeatedly.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

A bug indeed,
Authored by: albert on Friday, April 05 2013 @ 05:03 PM EDT
and if anyone believes that, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn....

IINM, Google was monetized from the git-go. Search data is one thing, but
personal info, like on a 'social' site, is something else. fb is desperate to
monetize itself...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )