decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
and that's another thing | 191 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apologies (and also to PJ).-n/t.
Authored by: macliam on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:18 PM EDT
.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

If possible to remove claim quotes from main text, would be beneficial.-n/t
Authored by: macliam on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 02:30 PM EDT
.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Yes. Its very important to everone here:
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 04 2013 @ 01:19 AM EDT
That they be able to say how terrible patents are without reading any of
them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

and that's another thing
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 04 2013 @ 03:17 AM EDT
> Some of us studiously avoid reading patents, and for good reason.

Another thing that's gone so horribly wrong with this bitter twisted
patent system. Patents were supposed to publish details of the
invention to to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.
Inventors were intended to read the patent so they would know
what not to repeat.

Patents have now become exemplars of obfuscation. Inventors
find themselves unable to read them and not thru any want of literacy.
Inventors find themselves unwilling to read patents that have been
written in a manner that in other areas of jurisprudence would be called
entrapment.

Why can't enough of these highly educated, highly motivated patent
attorneys apply some effort to make the system work like we the people
believe it should?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Thanks for the contamination, by the way
Authored by: PJ on Thursday, April 04 2013 @ 10:29 AM EDT
OMG. Please don't post stuff like that on
Groklaw. Just post a link.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )