Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 02 2013 @ 01:16 PM EDT |
This one's done. It's somewhat pathetic that Apple wants to hold phone
manufacturers to ransom because their screen goes "Boinggggg..." when
you scroll to far.
Even more pathetic that some think it's a patent with any merit whatsoever. To
even call it a gimmick would be insulting to gimmicks the world over.
Just my tuppence worth of course.
Calling 'pinch to zoom'; your time is up.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 02 2013 @ 01:44 PM EDT |
Claims 14, 17 and 18 were found patentable and/or confirmed....so.... you
know... [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mossc on Tuesday, April 02 2013 @ 02:03 PM EDT |
I THINK at this point from a legal standpoint the patent has to be assumed to be
invalid so it does make a difference in ongoing court cases(including damage
calculations, appeals, and injunctions). Of course IANAL[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 03 2013 @ 09:29 AM EDT |
If there's prior art and it can be shown that Apple knew
about it, there should be more action taken than simply
rejecting the patent. Apple should be fined for criminal
misconduct.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 04 2013 @ 01:24 AM EDT |
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|