decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
If you're not guilty.... of what? | 244 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
If you're not guilty.... of what?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 01:52 PM EDT

To add another huge concern: the abuse of power. If it's acceptable for the authorities to just wander where they want, checking what they want - abuse of power becomes harder to identify.

However - if there's nice clear rules (unlike the CFAA) then when someone of authority starts to abuse their power, you can easily point to the rules they are choosing to ignore.

To put in context: how does one prove abuse of authority in the case against Swartz? The CFAA was authored in such a way as to allow the prosecution to continue even when the "victim" made clear nothing wrong had occurred. All we have is "common sense arguments" - but that's very poor evidence in a Court of Law to prove wrong-doing on the part of the prosecution. While the Judges can denounce such behavior... can they punish? And if they can't punish... what deters further continued abuse along the same lines?

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )