Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 05:40 PM EDT |
Though I imagine tax records from 1979 might be considered irrelevant, I can't
think of much else... still I definitely remember the wording being made in a
way that anything that is still relevant for lawsuits 'couldn't' be destroyed.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 06:27 PM EDT |
Allege something against them which properly kept paperwork
would be necessary to disprove. Since they destroyed their own
paperwork, the court is free to draw all inferences against
them.
As if the hill weren't steep enough already...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 05:44 PM EDT |
If I were Cravath and IBM, I'd move for Spoilation of Evidence on that note.
They **REALLY** don't want to do this stupid thing they're doing right now...so
I don't get why they're even going there.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|