decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
it's in the law | 367 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
it's in the law
Authored by: Christian on Wednesday, March 20 2013 @ 03:47 PM EDT
"Show me a DRM system that actually works."

Read Hixie's recent comments?

Whether DRM works depends on what you think it is supposed to do. If the point is to stop the availability of illegal copies, it doesn't work. If the point is to effectively lock most legitimate users into specific hardware platforms, it works (because they won't bother to avoid the DRM, not because they can't).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

it's in the law
Authored by: Ronny on Wednesday, March 20 2013 @ 11:07 PM EDT
DRM, as with most technical means of protecting copyright, is not there
primarily to make copyright violation impossible but to make it too much of a
hassle.

If I have to spend an hour of my time to break the DRM on a file where a legal
licence would cost me five dollars, I would probably either spend the five
dollars or do something else. While the existence of pirate sites breaks this to
some extent, it also introduces additional risk factors (viruses, deliberate
corruption of files, unknown quality.)

The Analog Hole has its own limitations; for video, for example, even if the
video stream is captured at 100% fidelity, recompressing the stream will result
in some reduction in quality.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )