Hard to tell which of the groups this one fits into:

Straight out troll - raise a conflict where none exists for no other purpose then to raise a conflict

Subversion - Corporations attempting to convince those of us who rely on the GPL that it's really in our best interest to give the Corporations the license terms they want and receive a little money in exchange

Stupidity - like the Corporation who believed in the "GPL is invalid" to the point it took a Judge to tell them "if I accept your theory, I sure hope you have another license or you have admitted to a clear breach of Copyright Law"

At this point it doesn't matter. Enough has been said that the individual can be entirely ignored with absolutely no ill effects to oneself :)

Caveat: there's no rule that says the individual can't fit into all three, it's not an either-or scenario like the imaginary contract-or-copyright situation described ;)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]