decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Interesting Split | 367 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Interesting Split
Authored by: 351-4V on Tuesday, March 19 2013 @ 05:13 PM EDT
I'll agree that Kennedy on the dissent is wee-bit remarkable to me but Scalia I
think would find for the corporations even if they were suing his own mother.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

6-3
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 19 2013 @ 05:41 PM EDT
The really interesting bit about the split, IMO, is the concurrence. Kagan and Alito basically agree with the dissenters that the combination of this judgement and Quality King narrow the scope of §602(a)(1)'s import restrictions way beyond what congress intended, possibly so much as to leave it vestigial.

They joined with the majority because they think the way to remedy this is not to limit first sale itself, but to overturn Quality King - thus severing the limitations first sale places on §602, something that would have almost as great implications for the import of copyrighted material as this case would if it had gone the other way.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Did age play a factor in the split?
Authored by: vb on Wednesday, March 20 2013 @ 03:37 PM EDT
It seems to me that age played a factor in this split. The three oldest members
were all in the minority.

Granted, Breyer is not young, but clearly all of the baby boomers were in the
majority.

I hope that bodes well for future fights with overreaching rights holders.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )