decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
CDMA | 128 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
CDMA
Authored by: Ian Al on Thursday, March 21 2013 @ 03:02 AM EDT
It is one of those method patents with an on-a-mobile-phone system claim.

I thought I knew something about Code Division Multiple Access, but I was
confusing it with Carrier Sense Multiple Access.

From memory (having just copied it from Wikipedia) 'CDMA employs spread-spectrum
technology and a special coding scheme (where each transmitter is assigned a
code) to allow multiple users to be multiplexed over the same physical
channel.'.

The patent may not be CDMA since the term is used for several US mobile phone
systems based on CDMA.

It raises the question of whether it is an invention at all. The math function
method appears to be a way of sharing a code convention to allow multiple access
via wireless broadcast signals. The code convention has to be observed by both
the transmitter and receiver. In essence, it is just using math to generate a
number. The patent monopolises numbers generated by the math function when used
for setting up sessions on the multiple access broadband wireless communication
system.

As long as both transmitter and receiver use the same math function, it will
still work. Why is this math function a novel and useful invention when a vast
selection of alternative math functions will work equally well? It is not a
technical requirement of the protocol to use this particular math function.

It is only useful for systems designed to use that math function. The only value
of the patent is to provide an entry fee for access to this particular 'brand'
of mobile phone system. It is more a proprietary code than an invention.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Agreed. - Authored by: albert on Friday, March 22 2013 @ 02:39 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )