decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Robert Parry thinks Nixon created the Watergate burglars to destroy evidence of his treason | 170 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Robert Parry thinks Nixon created the Watergate burglars to destroy evidence of his treason
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 17 2013 @ 07:07 AM EDT
The Times began publishing the Pentagon Papers on June 13,
1971, and the disclosures touched off a public firestorm.
Trying to tamp down the blaze, Nixon took extraordinary
legal steps to stop dissemination of the secrets, ultimately
failing in the U.S. Supreme Court.

But Nixon had an even more acute fear. He knew something
that few others did, that there was a sequel to the Pentagon
Papers that was arguably more explosive – the missing file
containing evidence that Nixon had covertly prevented the
war from being brought to a conclusion so he could maintain
a political edge in Election 1968.

If anyone thought the Pentagon Papers represented a shocking
scandal – and clearly millions of Americans did – how would
people react to a file that revealed Nixon had kept the
slaughter going – with thousands of additional American
soldiers dead and the violence spilling back into the United
States – just so he could win an election?

A savvy political analyst, Nixon recognized this threat to
his reelection in 1972, assuming he would have gotten that
far. Given the intensity of the anti-war movement, there
would surely have been furious demonstrations around the
White House and likely an impeachment effort on Capitol
Hill.

So, on June 17, 1971, Nixon summoned Haldeman and Kissinger
into the Oval Office and – as Nixon’s own recording devices
whirred softly – pleaded with them again to locate the
missing file.

http://consortiumnews.com/2013/03/09/rethinking-
watergateiran-contra/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I knew there was something I didn't like about that guy...n/t
Authored by: albert on Monday, March 18 2013 @ 12:41 PM EDT
.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )