decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
the 'Australian Tax' - a Further Look | 336 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Shipping Charges
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 22 2013 @ 12:33 AM EDT

Hah!

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

the 'Australian Tax' - a Further Look
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 22 2013 @ 07:05 AM EDT

I got curious about this report. It only mentioned Apple, Microsoft, and Adobe. Who else was there?

Nobody. Only they were 'invited' to appear before Parliament. That doesn't mean pricing issues don't exist with other companies, just that these three are getting grilled. One good report is on the CNet Australia website. For others search 'Ed Husic IT Pricing Inquiry'

Apple at the House committee inquiry into IT pricing: live

Apple's responses are fascinating. They are trying to blame the MPAA/RIAA for everything. The problem is that in earlier hearings the MPAA/RIAA tried to blame Apple.

Who would you believe? Are both lying?

Should be interesting to see how this plays out, though there are rumors Australia may be coming up on an election, which might derail the hearings.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

the 'Australian Tax'
Authored by: JamesK on Saturday, March 23 2013 @ 11:20 AM EDT
"Last year the inquiry heard examples of an Arctic Monkeys album costing
$17.99 on iTunes in Australia but the equivalent of $13 overseas, and the movie
Toy Story costing $24.99 in Australia but about $10 overseas."

Must be the freight costs to down under. ;-)

Actually, in Canada, we've long seen similar on a lot of products. I've even
seen some things that are made in Canada sold at a fraction of the cost in the
U.S.. So tell me again about the duties, etc. Why should something made here
be significantly cheaper in the U.S.?


---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )