decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Thanks to PJ | 179 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Thank you PJ
Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 06:36 PM EDT
Thank you so much for all your hard
work, which is so important to us all.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Thanks to PJ
Authored by: Ian Al on Saturday, March 16 2013 @ 06:13 AM EDT
I'm glad you went with the Supplement especially in its final form. With all the
improvements, a very large document is organised with great clarity.

Thanks for your work and that of PolR.

We have been steeped in this stuff (together with practical, worked examples!)
for too many years to know whether this particular document is right for the
intended audience.

However, over the years PolR has refined his exposition of the individual topics
so that the point is made with clarity and force.

If the USPTO do not read and value it in all parts, we can be confident that it
is their deliberate choice to ignore the relevant facts and not that the
exposition of the arguments is too obscure.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )