decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
lose the right to protect our privacy | 282 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Mozilla’s Intention to Block Third-Party Cookies Bad for Business
Authored by: JamesK on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 11:42 AM EDT
{
but Google? really?
}

Google gets much of it's income from ads.

---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Indeed - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 02:46 PM EDT
Mozilla’s Intention to Block Third-Party Cookies Bad for Business
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 11:50 AM EDT
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this simply changing something from
"opt-out" to "opt-in"?

Third-party cookies are not nesseccary for banner-ads to function, are they?
They're only needed for the "sell lots of data about people to other
companies" sideline that most banner-ad companies have?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Black is white
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 12:17 PM EDT
When default is to block, and I have to *choose* whether to allow or not, how is
that limiting my feedom to choose my own online experience...?

Only a corporate spinmeister can say things like that with a straight face.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Black is white - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 12:40 PM EDT
    • Almost - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 03:41 PM EDT
  • No, White is Black - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 03:15 PM EDT
lose the right to protect our privacy
Authored by: Wol on Saturday, March 16 2013 @ 05:05 AM EDT
By making it harder for those who would steal it to track us?

Shades of 1984 doublethink, me thinks...

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )