Authored by: JamesK on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 11:42 AM EDT |
{
but Google? really?
}
Google gets much of it's income from ads.
---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Indeed - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 02:46 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 11:50 AM EDT |
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this simply changing something from
"opt-out" to "opt-in"?
Third-party cookies are not nesseccary for banner-ads to function, are they?
They're only needed for the "sell lots of data about people to other
companies" sideline that most banner-ad companies have?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 12:17 PM EDT |
When default is to block, and I have to *choose* whether to allow or not, how is
that limiting my feedom to choose my own online experience...?
Only a corporate spinmeister can say things like that with a straight face.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Black is white - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 12:40 PM EDT
- Almost - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 03:41 PM EDT
- No, White is Black - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 15 2013 @ 03:15 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Wol on Saturday, March 16 2013 @ 05:05 AM EDT |
By making it harder for those who would steal it to track us?
Shades of 1984 doublethink, me thinks...
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|