decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
By permission or work around.... | 282 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
By permission or work around....
Authored by: Wol on Saturday, March 16 2013 @ 04:48 AM EDT
Something I'm finding a bit annoying here - dunno whether it's trolls or people
who just don't understand - is those who say "but we shouldn't have
Standards Essential Patents".

Because what they're saying is that if I go to the hard work and effort of
creating a NEW market, they should be allowed to muscle in and nick all my
profits without having to pay me a thing.

I don't necessarily agree with patents, but if you're going to have them then
any *decent* patent worth having has a HIGH chance of becoming an SEP. Think
about it!

I come up with a bunch of patents. I don't let you play in my patch. I end up
with a small market, and a small profit (if I'm lucky).

I work hard. I come up with a bunch of real, decent, honest to goodness patents.
I happily licence them out so others can play in my patch. I end up with a big
market, and a sizeable profit. THOSE STANDARDS ARE SEP, PRECISELY BECAUSE I
SHARED THEM.

One only has to look at the difference in the mobile phone market either side of
the pond, to see which one works best :-)

That's why I made a bit of an emphasis on *new* market, because it makes the
justification and FAIRNESS of a properly working patent system much clearer.
What's wrong with you being shut out of a market that didn't exist before I
created it? Nothing! (If you believe in patents, that is.)

And that's what's so wrong here, in that the real inventors have created the
second type of market, and the newcomers are using the "SEP's are
unfair" to try and seize control and turn it into the first kind of
market.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )