|
Authored by: PJ on Thursday, March 14 2013 @ 02:54 PM EDT |
It seems simple to you, but the rest of the
world, including experts like Orin Kerr, say
it isn't simple in the real world.
Everything on the WWW is there. You can hit onto
things without even meaning to, or innocently
meaning to, just trying to find what you are
looking for. If you don't do deep research online,
you may not realize how easy it is to do that.
Keep in mind that security folks have to do
research that involves testing security. At the
moment, it's dangerous to do that, because some
idiot may decide you have overstepped the boundary
when you tell him that he's vulnerable.
And that is one reason, in my view, why Chinese
and E. Eu. and Russian hackers find the US such
easy pickings. I think that is a serious downside
to simplistic thinking like yours and the CFAA.
The Internet doesn't work precisely like houses.
The analogy was about legal consequences, and nothing
more. In meat space, you can't end up in someone's
house inadvertently, unless you think it's your
house and then realize it isn't once you are inside.
That is incredibly unlikely and rare.
But online, it is easy and it is very hard to
know in advance where the line is. Swartz seemed to
think that what he was doing was legal. His lawyer
still says it was. The prosecutor differed. So
how simple is it? Not as simple as you seem to
think.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Wol on Thursday, March 14 2013 @ 09:13 PM EDT |
It's not that simple.
What happens if you wander into what you think is a derelict house, and it
isn't? I've done almost exactly that as a kid.
And what if you think a place is a public park (or path) and it isn't?
And now in the UK we have the "right to roam" legislation which I
suspect can be really confusing! Basically, it says that any open land that is
not being actively farmed, we can wander across. Okay, I'm sure people will tell
me I'm misinformed and vague. But that's roughly what the legislation says.
Okay, it's very clear that you can't wander over crops. But what about wandering
across a field of cattle? Or through a wood?
Especially "through a wood"! It can be perfectly legal one day, and
illegal the next, depending on what the owner is doing that day!
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 14 2013 @ 11:12 PM EDT |
You're blowing this way out of proportion. No one is saying you need moats and
razor wire. What we're saying is that you need to shut your door. Locking it
is a good idea, too. None of that other crap is necessary.
The door to JSTOR's database was not only unlocked, but the door was wide open.
Intentionally wide open. They were relying on people having good behavior. Mr.
Swartz exploited that, but it was in no way like someone going in and breaking
all your stuff. JSTOR was not injured and did not seek charges against Mr.
Swartz.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: cjk fossman on Thursday, March 14 2013 @ 11:44 PM EDT |
No one is forcing you to put your data on a computer.
You made that decision yourself.
It's up to you to protect it. If you don't want to take the
necessary steps, don't put it on a computer.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|