|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 14 2013 @ 05:44 PM EDT |
Given Gottschalk v. Benson,
Why did US8346836 B2 Issue on January 1, 2013?
Doesn't the following claim represent a patent on the algorithm itself?
1. A method for area and speed efficient fast Fourier transform (FFT) processing
comprising:
mapping a one-dimensional discrete Fourier transform (DFT) to a
multi-dimensional representation;
re-indexing the multi-dimensional representation as a radix 23 decimation
architecture;
simplifying the radix 23 decimation architecture to obtain a nested butterfly
architecture;
acquiring N samples of a finite duration time-sampled signal; and
inputting the acquired N samples into the nested butterfly architecture to
obtain a N-point fast Fourier transform (FFT) output.
I think the Answer is, .... maybe, but it isn't an abstract idea. Its radix 23,
not radix N, Its 1 dimensional FFT to multidimensional, not N dimensional to M
dimensional, etc...
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|