decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
MPEG LA and Google Settle: What Does it Mean? | 335 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
There Was That Whole Internet Thing, Too
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 01:20 AM EDT

There Was That Whole Internet Thing, Too

But more important than any of this, was the Internet. Back then Office was the first software I'd install on a computer, and a computer without Office wasn't fully a computer. (...) Suddenly computers weren't entirely about Office, they were now about Office and the Internet.

I was working for a large multinational in the 1990s who were big fans of everything Microsoft. At the time Microsoft had given up on resisting the Internet, but were still fighting to keep Internet technologies out of internal corporate networks ("Intranets").

Microsoft had a system for Intranets which was based around Microsoft Office. Instead of linked HTML "documents", it used linked Microsoft Office documents. You used Microsoft Word as the "browser" and used to to navigate from document to document. I can't recall what Microsoft called the product, but it was absolutely horrible.

At the time it sounded like a plausible idea. After all, "everyone" new how to use MS Word. However, you only had to try it once to see how archaic and inflexible it was. The company ditched it after a few months and replaced it with a web server.

Personally, I think tablets and smart phones are going to kill MS Word. Word processors are all about fitting text precisely on a fixed size page. Web pages are all about letting text adapt itself to whatever space is available. Once tablets are common in business, why would people routinely print out pages on paper? There may be special cases where paper can't be replaced, but for 95 - 99% of current paper consumption cases, there is no need for printing if you can use a table instead.

If you are using a tablet, then a word processor makes no sense. Tablets and smart phones inherently come in varying sizes. The work processor concept doesn't work there. Instead of pixel perfect text rendering on a fixed page size, you need something that automatically adapts itself to varying conditions. Well, we already have that, it's called HTML web pages. That solves a whole host of problems associated with trying to use word processor documents in a non-trivial business environment. We don't need better clones of Microsoft Word. We need software and systems that help businesses abandon the word processor concept.

I can still see a need for spreadsheets, but I seriously doubt that it really matters what spreadsheet most people use. Yes, for some financial uses it may matter, but for most people it doesn't. Most people actually seem to use spreadsheets as small databases to organize and sort data or to do simple ad-hoc calculations. Virtually any spreadsheet would do for that, and they can be selected on price just like any other purchase. If the bean counters need a specific spreadsheet, then give it to them. There is no need to force their spreadsheet choice on everyone else. We don't after all insist that the bean counters need AutoCAD just because the engineers use it.

So yes, I think the Internet matters. Only, businesses haven't really adapted to it yet and are still working in ways that assume the computer is just a better typewriter.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Low-numbered ports and root access? ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 08:30 AM EDT
"Did you know that the Web's original default port was 2784< /a> because low-numbered ports such as 80, today's default, needed root access?"

And that's why firewalls are next to useless in protecting todays innovative,open any port, systems ...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Facebook reveals secrets
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 06:10 PM EDT
No, seriously, this time someone has measured how much they reveal.

For those who detest FT's in your face paywall the story is covered on

Cambridge News,   BBC,   LA Times, and the paper itself.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

MPEG LA and Google Settle: What Does it Mean?
Authored by: Tim on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 08:46 PM EDT
Apparently written with a pro-Apple perspective, but interesting nonetheless: Link - strong language in comments.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge “came in like a tornado” at Prenda Law lawyers
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 11:41 PM EDT
That sounds like probable cause to arrest the principles for
identity theft. I wonder if the judge will quietly tell law
enforcement about that. Also can't the judge order people
arrested if they fail to appear in court?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

..angry judge at Pretenda Law
Authored by: arnt on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 12:10 AM EDT
.. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/ angry-judge- blasts-porn-trolls-someone-has-an-awful-lot-to-hide/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

..Brett Gibbs Gets His Day In Court — But Prenda Law Is The Star
Authored by: arnt on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 12:21 AM EDT
.. http://www.techdirt.c om/articles/20130311/19422822287/deep- dive-analysis-brett-gibbs-gets- his-day-c ourt-prenda-law-is-star.shtml

..author's site:
http://www.popehat.com/2013/03/11/brett-gibbs-gets-his -day- in-court-but-prenda-law-is-the- star/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Clapper v. Amnesty International: What does "certainly impending" mean?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 02:03 AM EDT
In a 5-to-4 ruling, the Supreme Court held that the human rights and media groups could not show, without resorting to speculation, that they faced "certainly impending" harm from the 2008 amendment. The majority also said that the plaintiffs could not establish standing through the costs they incurred to prevent harm from the new law.

[..]

The decision holds that standing cannot be based on the speculative possibility of future harm or even on the 2nd Circuit's standard of an "objectively reasonable likelihood" of injury. Supreme Court precedent, Alito wrote, demands that plaintiffs show a "certainly impending" threat of harm in order to establish standing. "A highly attenuated chain of possibilities," he wrote, "does not satisfy the requirement that threatened injury must be certainly impending.... We decline to abandon our usual reluctance to endorse standing theories that rest on speculation about the decisions of independent actors."

http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/ViewNews.aspx?id=71080

is there a definition for the term, or has a definition evolved in case law? Or is this a brand new term the justices have blessed us with?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

amusing presence in the courtroom
Authored by: IANALitj on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 02:34 AM EDT
There is a fascinating write-up of the Prenda Law proceeding in Los Angeles at
http://www.popehat.com/2013/03/11/brett-gibbs-gets-his-day-in-court-but-prenda-l
aw-is-the-star/

Purely for your amusement, the report includes the following: "There was a
nervous titter — one of many — in the courtroom."

If I were a titter in a federal courtroom, I would be nervous, too. Cf.
http://www.publicradio.org/applications/formbuilder/projects/joke_machine/joke_p
age.php%3fcar_id=226206&joke_cat=Bawdy



[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )