For the convenience of others, this was an anonymous comment on the Popehat article:

My recollection is that when Jason Sweet, Godfread's attorney and long time defender of John Does v. Prenda was asked "have you noticed… That every representation made by a lawyer with Prenda Law is not true?" by Judge Wright, he actually reaponded with "I've known that for three years" before sitting down. It was quite dramatic.

---
Recursion is the opprobrium of the mathists.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• Made me look too ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 03:47 PM EDT
  • Made me look too ... - Authored by: charlie Turner on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 06:30 PM EDT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• Perry Mason Moment at the Prenda Law hearing - Oh oh :-) - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 01:07 PM EDT
  • Getting the Judge to ask more questions is not a bad thing... - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 01:18 PM EDT
    • I thought that went without saying n/t - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 01:30 PM EDT
• Perry Mason Moment at the Prenda Law hearing - Oh oh :-) - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 01:48 PM EDT
  • I wasn't there, but I suspect... - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 02:56 PM EDT
• Perry Mason Moment at the Prenda Law hearing - Oh oh :-) - Authored by: albert on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 01:48 PM EDT
  • Perry Mason Moment at the Prenda Law hearing - Oh oh :-) - Authored by: Steve Martin on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 07:43 PM EDT
• Lawyer => Officer of the court - Authored by: hardmath on Tuesday, March 12 2013 @ 03:28 PM EDT
  • Is speaking as a witness different? n/t - Authored by: albert on Wednesday, March 13 2013 @ 11:04 AM EDT
• Perry Mason Moment at the Prenda Law hearing - Oh oh :-) - Authored by: DannyB on Wednesday, March 13 2013 @ 01:20 PM EDT
  • Perry Mason Moment at the Prenda Law hearing - Oh oh :-) - Authored by: tinkerghost on Wednesday, March 13 2013 @ 01:26 PM EDT