|
|
|
| Authored by: artp on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 12:49 PM EST |
"Eror" -> "Error" in Title Block if possible, please.
---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: artp on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 12:51 PM EST |
Apropos is thataway ----------->
No discussions of entropy, either.
---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- No entropy; I agree, that topic is all worn out n/t - Authored by: cjk fossman on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 01:07 PM EST
- Nokia loses German patent action - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 01:30 PM EST
- Apple switches to Sharp screens... Samsung buys into Sharp. - Authored by: squib on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 02:08 PM EST
- MPAA-funded study finds Megaupload shutdown led to $1M/week more legal sales - Authored by: bugstomper on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 04:03 PM EST
- Singapore Professor Denied Tenure - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 06:46 PM EST
- French Minitel a source for prior arts? - Authored by: IMANAL_TOO on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 05:47 AM EST
- Apotropy - Authored by: hardmath on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 09:26 AM EST
- Google Docs Blocked by Oxford University - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 04:49 PM EST
- Meet Titan, the world’s fastest computer — for now - Authored by: JamesK on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 04:56 PM EST
- Daily Dose of Paranoia - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 05:01 PM EST
- Windows 8 No Better Than Vista, Says Samsung Exec - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 01:40 PM EDT
- Apple & Google merging - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 04:00 PM EDT
- facebook privacy - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 06:26 PM EDT
- facebook privacy - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 06:02 AM EDT
- Michael Sandel’s Famous Harvard Course on Justice Launches as a MOOC on Tuesday - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 07:02 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: artp on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 12:53 PM EST |
URL, please.
Scrolling is such sweet sorrow....
---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Red Hat's Java leadership grows as Oracle's wanes - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 02:39 PM EST
- Apple Privacy Lawsuit - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 03:25 PM EST
- Microsoft Complains It Can't Keep Up With Google Ads - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 03:41 PM EST
- Microsoft erects 150foot high statue of Janus - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 11:07 PM EST
- Microsoft: Student Privacy Should Not Be for Sale - Authored by: albert on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 01:25 PM EST
- Despite the Chromebook Pixel, Google Knows Exactly what Chromebooks Are for - the Latest Video - Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 07:48 AM EDT
- WordPress to fight “legally deficient and objectionable” Prenda subpoena - Authored by: bprice on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 08:36 AM EDT
- Crouton: Ubuntu (xfce4) Chroot On Google Chrome OS - Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 08:47 AM EDT
- Samsung Exec Bashes Windows 8 - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 01:53 PM EDT
- Mark Cuban is an Idiot, Patents Do NOT Impede Innovation - Authored by: albert on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 05:00 PM EDT
- Gene Quinn is Right - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 05:37 PM EDT
- Well, patent claims have been hard to understand for hundreds of years - Authored by: Wol on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 05:49 PM EDT
- After reading his reply to my post, - Authored by: albert on Sunday, March 10 2013 @ 07:10 PM EDT
- Mark Cuban is an Idiot, Patents Do NOT Impede Innovation - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 10:02 AM EDT
- Mark Cuban is an Idiot, Patents Do NOT Impede Innovation - Authored by: albert on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 02:16 PM EDT
- Mark Cuban is an Idiot, Patents Do NOT Impede Innovation - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 11 2013 @ 11:23 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: artp on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 12:55 PM EST |
See link
above marked "Comes v. MS" for further information. ---
Userfriendly
on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 02:08 PM EST |
Trying to read between the lines-
1. If a judge asks the parties, sua sponte, to file a joint
report on whether the case should be stayed, then you have a
good idea as to the direction the judge is leaning. Yes, the
judge is leaning toward a stay- if the judge wasn't, the
judge wouldn't have requested it.
2. The arguments of the parties should come as no surprise.
The old saying of "justice delayed is justice denied" has a
special meaning in civil litigation on the defense side.
Absent a truly frivolous case that you can MtD, you almost
always want to delay (while still working toward victory).
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the various
claims, given the procedural posture of the case, all delays
are conducive to Samsung's position.
3. While Apple can (and likely would) appeal a stay, and the
law might be on their side, this is the type of issue that a
CoA would duck.
4. So I think it is likely that the judge will stay the
litigation. After all, she seems pretty exhausted by both
parties, and does have other cases that don't have 500
lawyers constantly filing motions.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: argee on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 02:52 PM EST |
What Apple fears is that Samsung will take their
smart phone design, put new outside plastic on it,
and a few software changes and its now the
Galaxy 9! Not encumbered by injunctions.
Given the pace of the Court System, I think that
Samsung will have no problem staying ahead in this
game. To Samsung, these phones are a commodity item
and expect new models every 6 - 12 months.
Amusingly, My Galaxy S3 is not rectangular. The sides
are parallel, but the top and bottom are rockered.
Clearly not "rectangular with rounded corners."
---
--
argee[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 03:50 PM EST |
I'm kind of surprised that there isn't anything about
comparatively Apple has unlimited cash and seems bent on
outspending Samsung and thus " buying" justice and trying to
put Samsung into bankruptcy.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: DannyB on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 04:27 PM EST |
Apple Would Be Substantially Harmed by a Stay.
Why can't they just say:
Apple Would Be Substantially Harmed by not getting an absolute monopoly on the
evolution of smart phones.
---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: TiddlyPom on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 02:35 AM EST |
What Apple are saying is (paraphrased)
If somebody comes out with a
competitive product based on a technology we don't like (i.e. Linux/open source
software) then we have the right to drive them off the market rather than
competing fairly with them.
IMHO patents and copyrights
now
- Reduce choice
- Destroy legitimate competition
- Work
against consumer interests
- Only work to preserve existing monopoly (or
near monopoly) interests for ridiculous extended
periods
<opinion>
Microsoft, Apple and
Oracle are patent trolls (and to be honest the Hollywood film industry and audio
industry are copyright trolls). Preserving patents and copyrights for more than
3-5 years in the digital age is ridiculous and is hurting consumer choice and
freedom. It is about time they were
axed.
</opinion>
---
Support Software
Freedom - use GPL licenced software like Linux and LibreOffice instead of
proprietary software like Microsoft Windows/Office or Apple OS/X [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: bugstomper on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 03:07 PM EST |
In hindsight, Judge Koh's decision makes quite a bit of sense. Staying the
proceedings leaves the same burden on the Court, like leaving debt for the next
generation. Yes, it is possible that much would become moot, maybe that would
reduce the future load. But there is even more streamlining to be had by telling
the parties that they have to greatly reduce the scope of the case in exchange
for not having it stayed. This order is not phrased in that way, but that is how
Judge Alsup made it happen: He made it clear that if Oracle objected to dropping
claims from the case he would stay everything until it was clear how much
decisions from the PTO would reduce the case.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
