|
| Authored by: ukjaybrat on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 04:05 PM EST |
It'll be a long time before we get to the point where Samsung
can't afford to go to court anymore. Especially since they've
been winning basically everywhere except in the US
---
IANAL[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Charles888 on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 04:53 PM EST |
| nt [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 12:18 AM EST |
Remarkable really - Samsung builds a "better mousetrap" and poor Apple
now wants to claim dibs on the very concept of a mousetrap.
Interesting to reduce the patent dabate to mousetrap level.
Evidently one cannot patent "a device for catching mice"?
Can one patent a device where "the weight of the body of aforesaid rodent
causes lever A to rotate downwards thereby releasing catch B and allowing the
aforesaid tensioned spring to propel arm C downwards in an arc Y to decend
rapidly on the neck of aforesaid rodent"?
Would an apparatus in which the removal of the mass of cheese (rather than the
weight of the mouse) triggered the deadly sequence be different?
Can one patent a broad category of devices whereby "interruption of a
light-beam" sets the lethal apparatus into action?
Answers on a postcard please.
Mac
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
