decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Windows 'features' not in Ubuntu | 228 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Windows 'features' not in Ubuntu
Authored by: mcinsand on Wednesday, March 06 2013 @ 01:25 PM EST
Some people just want to stay with what they are used to seeing every day, so I
have no doubt that customers might want to purchase add-ons that give them what
they have come to expect in Windows' performance. When you were looking at
a-la-cart extras, was there an Ubuntu Virus-Magnet edition to give the lack of
security so characteristic of Windows? Given the programmer-hours that would be
needed to have Linux (or almost any other OS) have the same virus susceptibility
of Windows, that would be a fairly pricey add-on. For the more
economically-conscious, I'm sure that a BSOD Anti-Reliability application would
be far less expensive. This app would randomly flash a BSOD (maybe with
'SUCKER' in big, flashing letters) as the computer is frozen to force a hard
reboot.

I dunno that I would be willing to spend the money needed to give the same
performance that I have come to expect from Windows. Then again, that is why I
use Linux; I don't have to spend so much of my free time keeping my computer
running, chasing drivers, etc. I guess I am just cheap.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )