decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
WOW - ??? | 115 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
WOW - There is cluless then there is... Peter Bright
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 07:37 AM EST
Quote: "Google didn't have much of a presence at the show this year, but Android (and Androids like this one at Intel's booth) "


LOL .... Just all those phones using it?! Right?

What he is missing, amongst a lot of other things, is that Google's entire strategy can be noiled down to 7 words:
"Get people to use the Internet more."
Why is this so hard for people immersed in MS's world to 'grok'?

Well I suppose we should count our blessings ;-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

WOW - There is cluless then there is... Peter Bright
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 07:45 AM EST
>There’s no obvious way for Google to reclaim Android.

heh ?! WHAT?!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

WOW - ???
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 07:48 AM EST
>"Come 2014, it would be no great surprise to find the last
vestiges of the Android name gone forever."

What ARE you smoking?!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • WOW - ??? - Authored by: artp on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 12:38 PM EST
WOW - There is cluless then there is... Peter Bright
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 08:19 AM EST
Just another M$ blovating orifice.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

WOW - There is cluless then there is... Peter Bright
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 09:05 AM EST
"Google. The company's invisibility in Barcelona" is exactly what they
want. Google are assumed, no-one even questions it. Just like in search. I
think this is exactly where they want to be.


' "Lumia" is the brand with name recognition, not "Windows
Phone." ' Well duh. No-one wants to be associated with "Windows
Phone", it's recognised as a failed experiment.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Peter Bright has to fill column inches
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 03:42 PM EST
Otherwise he might not eat so well. He's only saying what a load of
other media have been reporting, MWC is fading to a sideshow, the
real developments in the mobile industry now happen so fast the
customers want them now, want them hot, and nobody can wait
for the once a year circus tent of MWC.

Android's perceived invisibility is what I'd expect. Since almost
everybody has it, it's no longer a marketing bonus. The hardware
vendors are forced to sell on hardware features. Comments below
the ars article hint too many makers are confusing the market
with stupid differentiating features, and it's about time Google
cracked down on some for not following UI guidelines, and
failing to supply timely Android updates. The makers just want
to shovel out phones, dumb, smart, what the heck, and Android
is just a handy industry standard OS that saves them some R&D.

The misconception that Google may have lost Android to
Samsung was covered in much of the press over the last couple
of weeks. There were also suggestions that HTC, LG and others
may be gathering like vultures to tear Android apart. Google may
be speaking quietly, let's hope they are also carrying a big stick.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

clueless indeed
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 05:23 PM EST
The main thing I noticed is his complete inability to grasp the concept that
diversity is a good thing in FOSS. If Samsung want to slap on a different UI on
their Android phones, let them.
If it works well, it will be successful and will become the dominant standard.
If it doesn't work well, it will perish. There is no need for anyone to exert
tight control over "their" OS, in order to ensure "a quality
experience". That which works best, gets used.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )