decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Torvalds was right - don't trust Microsoft with certificates | 115 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Torvalds was right - don't trust Microsoft with certificates
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 05:19 AM EST
Actually, while I can't make total sense of whatever is going on, I don't think
Red Hat want to trust MS at all. The BIG PROBLEM is that all your hardware
drivers are going to be loaded into EFI. And they're all going to be signed.
With MS keys!!!

(And without that driver, aka binary blob, your hardware may not work at all!)

All Red Hat want is for the user to have the ability to say "trust this
MS-signed PE blob". While Linus' attitude is "PE is nothing to do with
linux".

If we go with Linus and enable users to sign these blobs with their own keys,
then fine. The alternative suggestion, that has apparently been doing the
rounds, that Red Hat themselves sign these blobs, is not surprisingly
unacceptable to Red Hat.

So what this impasse is doing at the moment is preventing users from running
binary hardware drivers. Which may or may not be a good thing ...

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Torvalds was right - don't trust Microsoft with certificates
Authored by: rcsteiner on Tuesday, March 05 2013 @ 02:43 PM EST
"The on-line discussion was filled with words unsuitable, even for the Internet

Heh. Wow. You obviously don't remember USENET. :-)

---
-Rich Steiner >>>---> Mableton, GA USA
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )