decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Of course Oracle are distributing... | 246 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Of course, once Oracle distributes...
Authored by: tknarr on Monday, March 04 2013 @ 03:30 AM EST

It depends on what they need to do. If they can do it as a module, no changes to the kernel proper and not using anything beyond the defined interfaces, then they can distribute those modules just like any other binary-only module.

But my understanding is that DTrace goes far beyond the defined interface between modules and the kernel, it needs to get deeply into the kernel internals using things that're explicitly flagged as not part of the public interface and it needs actual modifications of the source code of the kernel proper. And once you've gotten into that, you're solidly into an area where you can't distribute the result under anything other than the GPLv2 without releasing the kernel itself under something other than GPLv2 which you don't have a license to do.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Of course Oracle are distributing...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 04 2013 @ 01:57 PM EST
From the Article:
Oracle has ported one of its most coveted Solaris tools to the Linux platform, a real-time debugging tool called DTrace, though the company has made it officially available only for its own Oracle Linux distribution.

With the release of Oracle Linux 6.4, Oracle announced that participants in its Unbreakable Linux Network (ULN) -- available with a paid Oracle support license -- can download a copy of DTrace for Linux. [emphasis added]
Follow the links arriving here, and you will find that dtrace is downloadable for install by those lucky customers who have bought a support package for Oracle Linux 6.4. This doesn't sound much different from all those non-free packages available via the repositories of most major distros.

The dtrace code has been available from Open-Solaris for yonks. Anybody downloading it and building it for their system is beholden to read and obey all the licenses, plural, involved in that transaction. I fear a flareup of the old argument about who is responsible should dtrace leak into the wild. First you'll have to look at the license for this version of dtrace. Then come back and tell me how it's not the downstream distributor at fault, if there be any fault.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )