decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
That's the other concern - and yea, it's primary above all else | 235 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
That's the other concern - and yea, it's primary above all else
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 28 2013 @ 05:35 PM EST

That's the concern with why I won't purchase hardware where you can't disable UEFI. I own my computer and I get to decide what goes on it. Coincidently: I decided MS code would never touch my current hardware - and it hasn't!

So yea - other then the "it's a really, really bad idea to trust MS... and 2 "really"s is about a thousand reallys too short.... the owner is the one who has the authority to decide what goes on the device. Anyone else attempting to end-run that authority is trying to usurp control.

Instead of being a market place where consumers decide whether or not they want to be a MS customers, it's a forced marketplace where everyone is a MS customer whether they want to be or not.

Imagine a market where MS gets to decide who is trusted. Now instead of messing around with the code base to eliminate Netscape from IE competition, they merely revoke the Netscape certificate.

Not the kind of environment I want to be part of even if the anti-competition watchdogs can't currently see the serious danger inherent in granting such a historically bad performing enterprise with such responsibility.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )