|
Authored by: Wol on Wednesday, February 27 2013 @ 02:05 PM EST |
If injunctions aren't available, then nobody would pay for SEPs. Hence a ban on
injunctions is 100% harmful.
If injunctions are used as a *standard* negotiating tactic, then newcomers are
likely to be forced out of the market. That too is harmful. But that is NOT the
case here.
Here, the prospective licencees (MS and Apple) don't want to pay anything. An
injunction is necessary otherwise they will effectively be allowed to get away
with theft.
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: cjk fossman on Wednesday, February 27 2013 @ 04:49 PM EST |
Well, we can build a model based on the information in front of
us, such as specific cases.
Or we can take the alternative approach and build a model based on
hypothetical cases and our beliefs about the way things should
work (according to us).
If the last election taught us anything, it is that the latter
approach does not work.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|