Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

It makes a lot of sense | 235 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

It makes a lot of sense

Authored by: marcosdumay on Friday, March 01 2013 @ 08:07 AM EST

Yes, Motorola standing was almost like what I said. The only difference is that
they offered a proportional tariff, not a fixed one. It's a very small
difference in this context.

There are some problems with offering discounts for some parties (like in a
cross licensing agreement), but they are the same problems we always had with
patents (and about the same magnitude) - they lead to anticompetitive
behaviours. If "The People" thinks patents are a good thing, there is
nothing more against that kind of deal. But not price increases, they shouldn't
be ale to get more than the nominal (public) price.

@cjk fossman
Yes, a judiciary system that won't even listen you for a long while undermines
everything. If that's the case, how can anybody support injuctions at all? It's
denying due process for a party.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )