Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Motorola Surprises Microsoft - The Germany-Seattle-FTC FRAND Saga Continues ~pj | 133 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Motorola Surprises Microsoft - The Germany-Seattle-FTC FRAND Saga Continues ~pj

Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 24 2013 @ 05:56 AM EST

I earlier understood this court's worldwide jurisdiction is
based on an order to Motorola US about what Motorola Germany
could do. Did Motorola find a way around that order?

Just wondering, is this kind of order new? Or would it be a
precedent? Just guessing. If it would be new, I can image
that some local groups that are in conflict with
multinational company's, would appreciate that kind of
precedent. If it is more juridically clear the real
decisions are made in the country of the headquarter, it
may be easier to put that headquarter before court in it's
own country about the consequences of those decisions.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Motorola Surprises Microsoft - The Germany-Seattle-FTC FRAND Saga Continues ~pj - Authored by: Wol on Sunday, February 24 2013 @ 11:26 AM EST
- Motorola Surprises Microsoft - The Germany-Seattle-FTC FRAND Saga Continues ~pj - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 03 2013 @ 01:01 AM EST
Motorola Surprises Microsoft - The Germany-Seattle-FTC FRAND Saga Continues ~pj - Authored by: albert on Sunday, February 24 2013 @ 11:39 AM EST
- Motorola Surprises Microsoft - The Germany-Seattle-FTC FRAND Saga Continues ~pj - Authored by: PJ on Sunday, February 24 2013 @ 01:35 PM EST
  - Thanks...n/t - Authored by: albert on Sunday, February 24 2013 @ 01:43 PM EST
- Is there a world-wide agreement for H.264 patent licensing? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 24 2013 @ 02:49 PM EST

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )