decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Intellectual property musical chairs? | 280 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Intellectual property musical chairs?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 20 2013 @ 12:04 PM EST
Well, APIs are the look-and-feel of software to programmers, and this case tries
to protect them via copyright (and a bit of patents which failed however), while
the look-and-feel of software towards users is protected with design patents.

Looks like a pea-shell game for look-and-feel going on: whenever you try proving
it nonsensical in one court, the game is actually in another court.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It will pretty much destroy the big FOSS projects on Windows
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, February 20 2013 @ 12:34 PM EST
After all, you pretty much have to use the windows API at some point, so
Microsoft can claim they infringe. Bye bye Firefox, LibreOffice, GIMP, Inkscape,
etc on Windows. Of course, the next to go would be me, because I would switch to
using Linux as a primary operating system.

Microsoft has to be careful, their grip on the desktop is not what it used to be
a decade ago. It's strong, but not unbreakable.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )