decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It makes money, lots of money.. | 168 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Transcript of Oral Argument in Bowman v. Monsanto: Where's Patent Exhaustion for Self-Replicating Patented Seeds? ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 20 2013 @ 05:19 PM EST
Use of a particular technology to modify your food doesn't
have anything to do with whether the result of the
modification makes the food healthier or not.

Monsanto makes its money by modifying food for economic
reasons, and most of the time these have nothing to do with
health. Making crops resistant to herbicide so you can get
rid of any weeds - that's good economics (especially from
the point of view of a company holding a patent on the
herbicide). Corn (maize) that produces insectide, ditto.
Whether this means humans eat more herbicide or insecticide,
and whether this particular herbicide or insecticide is
totally safe, are secondary factors.

But you *could* (and some scientists did) also use the same
technologies to, say, add Vitamin A to sweet potatoes or
rice, or make wheat more drought-resistant, or make rice
more flood-resistant. All of those have the potential to
hugely increase human health, and in some cases is already
doing so.

The thing is, you can't in general look at a food item and
tell whether it's been genetically modified. The
technology leaves no particular traces, it's just a tool.
It's like reading a novel and asking whether the author used
a computer to do the editing. The computer makes editing
easier, but whether the edits make the plot more interesting
or not is up to the author. You can't say that using a
computer results in bad books.

(Well, you could, if you built a much more sophisticated
argument, that the availability of easy editing makes
authors lazy, affects their work habits and writing style,
changes the dynamic of the author-editor relationship, or
some combination, and demonstrated how any of those changes
might result in an inferior plot, and futhermore rebutted
arguments that these changes have good effects that outweigh
the bad ones.)

PS The *perception* of effects on human health is an
economic factor that companies like Monsanto pay a lot of
attention to, but the perception is only loosely coupled to
human health.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It makes money, lots of money..
Authored by: albert on Wednesday, February 20 2013 @ 05:31 PM EST
I hate to be so cynical, but I have learned to live with it.

{:-)>

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )